With Texas and Oklahoma officially set to join the SEC in 2025, many fans and analysts initially feared the Big 12 would lose its national relevance. However, recent developments suggest the conference might actually emerge stronger and more competitive than ever—sparking debate among fans about whether this is a new golden era for the league.
New Powerhouses Emerging
Programs like Kansas State, Oklahoma State, and Utah have stepped up, proving they can be national contenders. Cincinnati, UCF, BYU, and Houston—the newest additions—are adapting quickly, while Colorado’s return, led by Deion Sanders, has drawn national attention. Could these programs create a more balanced and unpredictable Big 12?
More Parity, More Excitement?
Unlike the SEC, where a handful of teams dominate, the new-look Big 12 has no clear powerhouse. This could lead to one of the most competitive conference title races in college football, with multiple teams having a shot at the championship every year. Does this make the Big 12 more exciting than the SEC or Big Ten?
Financial Strength & Playoff Potential
Despite losing two historic brands, the Big 12 secured a strong TV deal through 2031, ensuring financial stability. Additionally, with the 12-team College Football Playoff debuting in 2025, multiple Big 12 teams could now make the postseason—something nearly impossible when Texas and Oklahoma dominated the league.
Is This Actually a Good Thing for the Big 12?
This shift raises a fascinating debate: Is the Big 12 better off without Texas and Oklahoma? Will the new structure create a more balanced, competitive, and unpredictable conference—something fans have long wanted?
Let’s hear your thoughts! Would you rather have a top-heavy Big 12 with Texas and Oklahoma, or do you prefer this new era where any team can rise to the top?